Towards a More Inclusive Electoral Process

In Agulu, Anambra State, on election day, a 90-year-old woman was brought to the polling unit. I helped her get down from the bike. Her back was bent, and she leaned on an umbrella she had turned into a walking stick. In the pocket of her dress, carefully preserved and laminated, were voter cards from a different electoral era, before the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) or biometric voter registration existed. She said she was unable to update her records as she has suffered from persistent back pain that had made repeated trips for voter registration impossible. Yet, when the day came to decide the future of her state, she chose to be present.

Her presence was more than symbolic. It was a quiet but powerful counter to the growing wave of voter apathy in Nigerian elections. Over the years, voter turnout has steadily declined, driven by distrust, fatigue, insecurity, logistical frustrations, and a weakening belief in the power of civic participation. This trend is part of a broader global pattern of democratic backsliding, in which citizens feel increasingly distant from political systems that should represent them.

However, this elderly woman’s act demonstrates something essential: democracy is not self-sustaining. It survives because ordinary people insist that their choices matter. Her determination, carried on her aching back, is the kind of resilience that keeps democratic institutions alive. Her story also raises a necessary question: Who is our current electoral system designed for?

She was willing to vote, but the system was not prepared to meet her where she was. Physical barriers, limited registration access, inadequate provisions for persons living with disabilities, and insufficient priority arrangements for elderly voters remain persistent challenges. These are not minor administrative oversights. They shape who gets to participate and who is silently disenfranchised from democratic processes.

If democracy is to endure, it must be more accessible. This means:

  1. Designing registration and voting processes that account for age and mobility.
  2. Ensuring priority services for elderly voters and persons with disabilities.
  3. Providing accessible information and polling environments for women, caregivers, and rural populations.

The older woman in Agulu did her part. She showed up despite pain, age, and systemic barriers. Though she was unable to vote, her attempt was a testament to her belief in a country that has not always made belief easy. Democracy thrives when participation is both possible and valued.

Cite this article

APA: Amina Miango. (2025). Towards a More Inclusive Electoral Process. CJID. Retrieved from https://thecjid.org/towards-a-more-inclusive-electoral-process/

Author